Time and time again whenever scheduling comes up with regards to a newborn baby, someone would bring up the Ezzos and then what I call the Ezzo-bashing would start.
Many of those who bash them haven’t even read their books. What they have read are comments or blogs by others who may or may not have followed the Ezzos’ advice in their popular books, Preparation for Parenting, Preparation for the Toddler Years and Growing Kids God’s Way*.
From what I gather, the Ezzos are mostly bashed for what they wrote in their first book, Preparation for Parenting, especially their controversial parent-directed feeding method and for their promotion of getting a child to sleep on his own. There circulating around in bloglands of horror stories of babies screaming for hours and mothers closing the doors on those babies just because it isn’t time for them to wake up or of babies who failed to thrive because the mother was an obsessive clock watcher and refused to nurse until it was the correct time. I am sorry to hear of those babies suffering but those parents should have understood the principle behind the Ezzos’ advice and not just follow it dogmatically.
With every method, there would be successes and failures. There would be tons of parents praising it and an equal amount of parents blasting it. I did not pay attention to the nay-sayers. Here’s why – their advice worked for me. It taught me that having a routine for the baby was helpful and reassuring for both the new baby and the new mother. Everyone knew what is expected. When the baby cries, the new mother does not need to guess why the child is fussing. She looks at the clock and is able to tell if the baby is hungry or plain tired. Yes, the more attuned mom does not need the clock to tell her that. Neither does the experienced mom. But the new, clueless, alone, sleep-deprived mom does! She does not end up continually nursing the baby just to keep him quiet, creating a habit that is hard to break later on. If it is sleep he needs, she puts him to bed, not offer him food.
If I had not read their books and applied their advice with modification (I nursed my babies every 2-3 hours, not 3-4 hours, and did not sleep train them to sleep through the night till they were at least past 6 months but usually past 1 year) I would not have been able to cope with so many little ones in the house with no external help.
Based on the Ezzos’ Eat-Play-Sleep cycle, the structure to the day was set and everyone knew it. Sure there were limitations (which method doesn’t?) in that once the babies learnt to fall asleep on their own beds, it was hard to get them to fall asleep anywhere else! But it also meant that I knew when my day started and ended, and when I could have my short little breaks for my own naps or quiet time or meal preparation. There was order in our day.
Some do not like this structure. They call it rigidity. It is to a certain extent. But it suited my personality and the way we lived. We generally would go out in between the children’s nap times. Was it restrictive? Yes. But it also meant we did not have children having meltdowns or running around like headless chickens because they needed to nap but mom and dad wanted to stay out.
For a season, we, especially I, would decline many outside engagements. Our season lasted longer than most with our every growing brood but for those of you with 2 or 3 children, your season will be much shorter. Once the children were down to one nap or dropped their naps, you could go anywhere, anytime! In fact, you may be wishing that they would nap so that you could catch your 40 winks! Lol!
For us, once we had more older children than younger ones, the dynamics changed. It was logistically not practical to keep everyone at home so that one baby could nap. So the younger 2 have had to be more adaptive. And yes, they had more meltdowns than the older ones ever did. But I also had more older ones to help out when that happened. So everyone adapted.
I am not here to say that the Ezzos’ way is for everyone. Some thrive on and love the no routine lifestyle. I am not one of those 😀 What I am saying is that the Ezzos’ method can work and does not even work against long term breastfeeding like many accused it of. The shortest I have nursed is 12 months to the dot (#3) and the longest was 34 months (#7). The rest varied between 14 months to 22 months.
The Ezzo method worked for us and we worked with its limitations. If the child-centred, attachment parenting way is what works for you and your family’s dynamics, go for it! But I just wish that people would read and understand their method before jumping in to add their 2 cents worth of negative comments when they don’t really know anything about it except the word scheduling and sleep training which somehow always gets people’s hackles up 😛
Every method has its pros and cons. Every family is different and every parent’s personality is different. We choose and share what works for us. There is no need to bash the other person’s choice. We don’t live their lives.
*For more information on the books put out by the Ezzos can be found on their website, Growing Families International or GFI. The secular version of these books are known as On Becoming Babywise.
*deep breath* 🙂 I’m not Ezzo’s greatest fan. I could never “babywise” my children. The Good Lord in His wisdom did not give me the personality for it, as you so rightly pointed out, Serene. My problem isn’t (entirely) with the sleep training method, but also with Growing Kids God’s Way. I have seen families on the verge of what I would consider abuse, while claiming to be using their methods. And my heart aches for them and for their children. Actually my opposition is with any method which people take and internalise and feel they need to implement wholesale. The only thing we take wholesale is the Bible. Everything else we take “under advisement” with prayer and in consultation with our spouses, together with whom we have been given the privilege to raise these children. It is wonderful that the method worked for you in that time, but you have clearly used it and modified it and not been legalistic about it. I am glad you said it in your post. I only pray others have the wisdom and discernment to do likewise. *hugs* Angie
Really? Those whom I know have lovely grown up children. Interesting how it can have such an opposite effect. Anyhow, your feelings against the Ezzos probably mirrors how I feel about attachment parenting 😀
I definitely agree that NO method should be applied 100%. It just isn’t right. Even the bible doesn’t prescribe that. It gives us a principle and then we have the freedom of application.
I tried out Babywise for 5 months with my eldest (coincidentally she was born the same day as your Ark
Blog!), after having heard from my good friend how well it worked with hers. My husband and i attended some home-based sessions facilitated by parents who had used Babywise too and spoke highly of it.
Being a first time mom, and we being a couple who like things structured, I really liked how the book and in the videos, it was stated categorically that we should take a parent-centred approach, and it was when we wavered from the methods prescribed that we would not be able to get the results that others had experienced.
So we plunged in quite determined to make it work. But with breast feeding being really hard for me initially, i could never tell when my baby was full. She would fall asleep nursing and I would try to wake her up. Putting her down to sleep, she would cry consistently for 20-30 mins (down from 45 min). Between the persistent crying, difficulties with breastfeeding, definitely no sleep through the night (following the guidelines from the book, it was to keep on persisting and def not to wait till baby was older).
Desperate and feeling guilty for allowing my baby to cry so much and feeling guilty at not following the guidelines as instructed, I really cried out to God. My nayiral instinct was to pick her up but the ‘warning’ given in Babywise was that we would be giving in and allowing the baby to be in control. And my
C-ness (DISC) told me I needed to be right, as prescribed by the book.
We stopped around Christmas. Later on we realized our relationship w our first wasn’t too good. She didn’t enjoy our hugs and attention when we were giving it and yet was super clingy at other times. On a chance occasion i spoke to my cousin (also a Christian SAHM like me) who used Babywise with her first and said her relationship with her first also wasn’t too good (she has 4, I have 3).. It would be unfair to say that using Babywise caused a poor relationship but I wonder if there is a connection somewhere.
Lastly, I want to say I have heard good things about the ezzo’s teaching, esp at teen level. It’s just that for first time parents, uncertain of so many things and wanting to grasp at some teaching or principle and being told so emphatically that THIS is the exact way, that how God the Father too turned away from Jesus at the cross is one scriptural support for letting your baby cry it out, it just didn’t seem right.
So I just wish there were some caveats inserted-that not every parent, or every child, is suited for Babywise/Growing Kids God’s Way (the 2nd title I feel seems to infer, esp to an inexperienced parent, that it is the only and right way). I am glad when it works for others. It just didn’t work for me… Okay, and my cousin. And I can honestly say I am happy it worked for you. Also btw I am thankful (v thankful) for your honest sharing online about your eczema and how God led you through it (a few of us at home are eczematic too), and your diligence in learning and growing and working hard at home (and sharing it with us all!). I thank God for you! 🙂